Showing posts with label DPD-RI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DPD-RI. Show all posts

Sunday, February 15, 2009

SUMMARY REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - 17Th APPF LAOS 11-15 January 2009, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR



THE 17th ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM (APPF) was held on 11-15 January 2009, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR and Indonesia participated with 7 delegates from DPR –RI ( the House of Representatives of RI ) and 5 delegates from the DPD RI ( Senate ) as followed :

1. Hon. Mrs. Maryamah Nugraha , as the head of delegation
2. Hon. Mr. Abdillah Toha
3. H.E. Dr. Laode Ida
4. Hon. Prof. Dr. Mrs. Wila Chandrawila Supriadi
5. Hon. Mr. Pupung Suharis Soegito
6. Hon. Mr. Dr. Hakim Sorimuda Pohan
7. Hon. Mr. Soeharno P.A.
8. Hon. Mr. Abdi Sumaithi
9. Hon. Mr. Nyoman Rudana
10. Hon. Mr. Malik Raden
11. Hon. Mr. Muchtar Naim
12. Hon. Mrs. Nafisah Sahal

13. Mr. Tatang Sutharsa, SH - Secretary
14. Dr. Genius Umar - Secretary
15. Mr. Ibnu Hadi - Advisor

DPD - RI delegates with Laos representative ( 4 th from left)





The Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Forum Executive Committee Meeting was held on Sunday 11 January 2009. Participants included representatives from the 8 of the 9 Executive Committee member countries, namely: Canada, Chile, China, Indonesia, Japan, Lao PDR, New Zealand and Singapore.

The meeting was chaired by His Excellency Thongsing Thammavong, President of the APPF and President of the National Assembly of Lao PDR.

The Executive Committee resolved that:

1. The agenda of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Forum, as set out in annex 1 be approved;

2. The Programme of Activities for the 17th Annual Meeting of the Asia- Pacific Parliamentary Forum, as set out in annex 2 be approved;

3. Hon. Dr. Saysomphone Phomvihane, Vice-President of the National Assembly of Lao PDR, and Hon. Dr. Kukeo Akhamontri, Vice-Chair of Foreign Affairs Committee be Vice-Chairs of the plenary sessions;

4. Prof. Dr. Boungnong Boupha, Member of the National Assembly of Lao PDR, be the Chairperson of the Drafting Committee;

5. The report on ARF 2008 will be presented by Singapore during the 2nd Plenary Session on 13th January 2009;

6. The draft resolutions submitted by the national delegations to the 17th Annual Meeting of the Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Forum, as set out in annex 3, be approved;

7. The time limits for speakers at the plenary sessions be 7 minutes for speeches and 5 minutes for participants in the open debate;

8. The Drafting Committee be created, and the necessary working groups be set up

9. Singapore host the 18th Annual Meeting of the Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Forum from 17-23 January 2010

10. The question of the enlargement of the APPF Executive Committee’s organization be further considered at the 18th APPF Annual Meeting; the APPF membership, observer status and rules of procedures be discussed on item IV: APPF matters in details later; and the Executive Committee may convene again during the meeting as required.






Cultural night - Welcome dinner


AGENDA MEETING OF 17TH APPF LAOS

Introduction of delegations
Adoption of decisions of the Executive Committee

I. Economic and Trade Matters ( 4 hrs duration )
1. Global Financial Crisis and APPF Effective Response
2. APEC 2008 in Peru: Report by Peru
3. WTO 2008
4. Sustainable Tourism
5. Energy Security
6. Food Security
7. Others








II. Political and Security Matters ( 3 hrs duration )
1. Review of the Political and Security Situation in the Asia Pacific Region and
in the World
a. ARF 2008 in Singapore : Report by Singapore
b, Peace and Stability in North East Asia
c. Peace and Stability in South East Asia
d. Middle-East Peace Process
e. Cluster Munitions
f. Terrorism

2. Others

III. Inter-Parliamentary Cooperation ( 2 : 30 hrs duration )
1. Parliamentary Capacity Building
2. Handling Climate Change and Environmental Issue
3. Natural Disaster Management
4. Poverty Reduction
5. Gender Issues in Parliament
6. Others

IV. APPF Matters ( 3 hrs duration )
1. APPF in Future (Membership, Observer Status, Rules of Procedures)
2. Date and Venue of APPF’s 18th Annual Meeting
3. Others

Adoption of Resolutions and the Joint Communiqué




With Senator Nyoman Rudana



Saturday, January 10, 2009

POINT OF INTERVENTION ON THE AGENDA ITEMS OF 17TH APPF ( ASIA PASIFIC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM ) MEETING In Vientiane, Lao PDR, 11 – 15 January 2009

I.POLITICAL AND SECURITY MATTERS

1. ARF 2008 in Singapore

Participation of Indonesia in many regional organizations would be utilized in order to maintain the Indonesian national interest. Political communication will be enhanced in order the people’ interest reflecting Indonesia participation in such regional and sub regional organization and in exchange to the benefit of the organization concerned for the sake in attaining the necessity of Indonesia.

Hence, Indonesia will utilize to its participation at ASEAN Regional Forum to maintain the sovereign and integrity of the Unitary State of The Republic of Indonesia, particularly through increasing proactive action in maintaining the stability and security of Asia Pacific regions at the forum.

2. Review on The Political and Security Situation in the Asia Pasific Region and in the world.

3. Peace and Stability in North Asia

As a peace loving country, Indonesia is opposed any kind of nuclear weapon’s tests and their means of delivery because it violates the Non Proliferation Treaty ( NPT ) and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Band Treaty ( CTBT ). Against these background, Indonesia fully supports “the Second Phase of Action for The Implementation of The Joint Statement “ signed by the six parties on October 3, 2007, which aimed at the denuclearization of the North Korea. To achieve this goal, the six Parties and others involved in the North Korean nuclear issue, should build closer international cooperation amongst them.

In addition, the Indonesian government always break through any development and protection of Human Rights in North Korea and request its government to pay attention in international community concerned in relation with the kidnapping foreigners. Therefore Indonesia always push out all parties concerned to accelerate their commitment that has reached as according to the deciding schedules.

4. Peace and Stability in Southeast Asia

a. South Thailand matters

Indonesia considers South Thailand matters as its internal affairs, so that international communities should honor and let Thailand overcome their problems.

b. Border crossing matters between Thai – Cambodia

Indonesia considers that border crossing problems should be solved through bilateral relation and peace approach under the Joint Border Commission and by the Spirit of ASEAN solidarity such as Treaty of Amity and Cooperation.


c. South Philippines Problems

Indonesia wishes to witness the peace and security situation in Southeast Asia and furthermore become the foundation to promote the creation of ASEAN community.

d. Current Political Development in Myanmar

For Indonesia, this Myanmar issue will be focused into three ( 3 ) prospective namely domestic, regional ( ASEAN ) and international which each of them is interrelated. In the context of domestic issue, the current situation in Myanmar is not only have a tendency to democracy crisis and Human Rights issues but also as implication of complex situation which is effecting to poverty crisis, national resilience and conflict among ethnics as well as disintegration threatening.

The solution for Myanmar issues is expedited by Indonesia not only in the framework of bilateral relationship with Myanmar but also in the context of regional / international. Indonesia, along with India, China and other ASEAN countries , through using such as constructive engagement’s approach in this case of Myanmar.



5. Middle East Process

Entering the new year of 2009, Indonesia have still witnessed that the complex situation in the Middle East remains to be an impediment towards the peace process. Indonesia diplomacy and humanitarian aid help Palestinians in their struggle for a separate state and to hold the ongoing Israeli military offensive in Gaza stripes.

Indonesian government issued a statement sent to UN calling on “ Israeli to immediately and its arbitrary use of force which contravenes international law, including the Geneve Convention.”

Therefore Indonesia calls for an immediate end to the grand operation, and asks Israel to do all possible to ensure the protection of civilians and that humanitarians assistance is able to reach those in need. Therefore further Indonesia condemns the Israeli aggression to the Gaza stripes.

Furthermore, Indonesia urges Palestina and Israeli to continuously develop direct and immediate negotiations to solve the existing core issues between the two parties, mediated by the quarter and the international community.

In this regard, Indonesia believes that unity and strong brotherhood of the Palestinians is fundamental to materialize as independent, sovereign State of Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital. Therefore, internal dialogue and negotiation between conflicting parties should be promoted towards national reconciliation.

To this end due to the recent aggression of the Israeli to Gaza Strips of Palestine, the Indonesian Senate of the Republic of Indonesia declared as follows :
In monitoring current situation in Middle East, particularly in Palestine, the Indonesian Senate viewed that :

1. the Israeli’s aggression was human criminal and therefore as evidence to an arrogancy and cruelty of Israeli and his allies.
2. Ignorance of some Middle East countries concerning of genocide.
3. The United Nations is malfunction in maintain sovereign of states and world peace from human criminal in Gaza Strips.

To this end, the Indonesian Senate strongly condemned the aggression of Isreaeli into Palestine and therefore declares as follows :

1. To appeal the government to :
a. Take diplomatic and other steps that urge the cease of the Israel aggression in Palestine either
in short or long term.
b. To enhance the humanitarian aid and deliver the Peace Keeping Corps in Palestine.

2. To appeal the UN to :
a. To stop the Israeli aggression by sending the Peace Corps to Palestine.
b. To ensure the sovereign of the Palestine country and urges Israel to exiles from the
Palestine region.
c. If point a and b cannot be executed, Indonesia must encourage all the peace loving countries to
urgently reformed the UN.

3. To further appeal the countries in the Middle East regions in order to accelerate regional
consolidation to be deliberately proactive involving in the cease of Israeli aggression in
Palestine.

4. To invite the government ( regional and central ) and all communities concerned to accommodate humanitarian support for the victims of Israeli aggression in Palestine.

5. To further appeal the International high Court to bring into court of those who involved in the said crime and give their evidence of responsibility on the case of Palestine aggression.

6. Cluster Munitions

Cluster munitions are the kind of explosive or sub-munitions with round size as an orange or soft drink that can be attracting to children but its explosion capacity maybe totally damaging a run way of airplanes, tanks or even army troops. Therefore the Secretary General of UN mentioned that “ the atrocious, in human efforts to these weapons should be seriously taken care of”. Hence the campaign of this anti weapon would be supported by all civilians in the world. The forbidden issue of this weapon always appears in every agenda topic of Convention of certain Convention Weapons in Geneve last November 2006. Nevertheless, Indonesia is not a part of this convention. Discussion on this cluster weapon failed to reach a success due to resistance coming from some countries such as USA, UK, The Federation of Russia and China.

7. Terrorism : refer to APEC point II 1 e.


II. ECONOMIC AND TRADE MATTERS

1. APEC 2008 in PERU

The result of APEC 2008 from 22 – 23 Nov 2008 with its theme “ A New Commitment to the Asia Pasific Development” has reached the so called APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting Declaration” consists of important issues namely :

a) Global economic situation and WTO Doha Development Agenda negotiations.
b) Promoting Food and Energy Securities.
c) Advancing Regional Integration and proposals for the development of the regional community.
d) Corporate Social Responsibility ( CSR )
e) Human securities including counter of Terrorism and Emergency Preparedness, Anti Corruption and Transparency.

In terrorism issue, all leaders emphasize on the APEC commitment relating to the trade in order to enhance welfare and sustainable development in Asia Pacific Regions from any other natural disaster and welcome to joint initiative Australia – Indonesia Facility on Disaster Reduction.

f) Anti corruption Declaration on the Financial Markets.


2. WTO 2008

In general, Indonesia still supports the initiative for continuing Doha Round Meeting. The failure of the Ministerial Level Meeting in July 2008 was a moment for Indonesia to review study in details through the opportunity based on the principle to be defended against further meeting. Indonesia has to review her position maximally regaring her point of view that the international trade is the source of financial development followed could reduce poverty. So that Indonesia can be more proactive in the next Doha Round Development Meeting and therefore such development becomes an important goal.

Part of Indonesia’s strategies are to actively participate at every group such as G -33, Cairo Group, New G – 6 and NAMA ( Non Agricultural Market Access)- 11 reflecting in WTO as the forum to discuss international trade issues for the benefit of Indonesia.


3. Sustainable Tourism.

In Indonesia Development Guidelines 1999, tourism in Indonesia has to be developed through an integrated system, interdisciplinary, participatory approach, using economical and technical criteria, ergonomic, sosio cultural sensitivity, energy saving, nature conservation and minimizing the environmental impact. The old tourism development approach has been changed to increase the welfare of local people participating in tourism.

Based on the fact that opportunity to develop ecotourism as a strategy to build sustainable tourism is huge.

Indonesia considers that ecotourism is a comprehensive tool to conserve biodiversity and to involve local communities and organization in a participatory way to drive maximum benefit in a sustainable way. Ecotourism has a potential to improve the quality of the environment, cultural values, local community prosperity, and the quality of human relations in general.

All the abovementioned hope in regard with sustainable tourism would become reality if the following activities can be focused, accelerated and arrange as :

a. Research and Planning

Actively conducting research to find a simple solution in creating models of ecotourism development.

b. Capacity Building

Improving technical capacity is one of the key of success factors in achieving sustainable tourism management. Empowerment not only be enhanced as local community levelbut more importantly at the level of tourism developers, managers and decision makers. It’s also necessary to build the capacity of ecotourism planning and management by facilitating information access,providing human resources development through training and provide opportunity for internship.

c. Destination Development

Facilitating regional and local partners to develop their areas to become ecotourism destination development becomes a priority. The role of destination development creates a model of ecotourism development which is appropriate for and can accommodate nature conservation, cultural heritage and community participation.

Some example in the development of community based ecotourism in Togean islands, central Sulawesi, Conservation Education based ecotourism in Gunung Halimun National Park, West Java, Ecotourism Development in Betung Kerihun National Park in West Kalimantan, Community based Ecotourism Development in Menoreh and Borobudur, Magelang district – Central Java, Wakatobi, Island for ocean tourism in south east Sulawesi, and West Bali National Park.

d. Marketing

Taking the opportunity to promote ecotourism products, in the form of books, newsletters, policy papers and ecotourism packages. As marketing is one of the biggest obstacles in community based ecotourism development in Indonesia. It needs a coordinating market efforts and supported marketing through its international networking.

e. Monitoring and Evaluation

To guarantee visitors satisfaction, local economic growth, natural resources protection, positive cultural exchange, heritage preservation and community involvement in ecotourism. It needs to develop guidelines to monitoring and evaluation for ecotourism destinations as part of its responsibility to minimize negative impact. For example, monitoring system in Bodogol Conservation Education Center in Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park, implementing environmental programs in number of hotels in Bali under Bali Focus and supported by Center for Environmental Leadership in Business Conservation International.


4. Food Security

The rising price of the main food supplies has a direct impact on the food sustainability, not only to the importer but also to the producer countries. The rising price of food supply will cause the availability of food supply substantially decrease and purchasing power of the low income societies become very low.

The increasing price of food supplies lately will also be triggered by something in dilemma, there is the arising attention towards climate change leading to bio-energy development. In this case, Indonesia has the capability to maintain the balance of the national food demand and supply, in order to stabilize the national food pricing.

For Indonesia, the main priority is not to decrease the price, but more into stabilizing the food pricing to make it affordable for the low income society. Rational price will be an opportunity, incentive and also a trigger for the farmers to increase the food productivity.

Indonesia considers that farming policy, either at the national or international level should be reorganized. The farming sustainability should be replaced as the center of the national development strategy.


5. Energy Security

The energy crisis faced by a number of countries in the world including Indonesia has caused various socio economy impact especially due to the budget burden bearing the subsidy, either the direct fuel subsidy ( domestic and transportation sectors ) or electricity subsidy due to the dependency to fossil energy at the most of electricity reactors.

Indonesia has very big potential renewable energy. The Indonesia’s geographical and natural resources has made several regions capable in developing renewable energy either in small or bigger scales.

Referring to the unique position of Indonesia as both the energy producer and consumer, in this energy security, Indonesia stresses on the importance of the energy security of supply and continuing flow of supply. For this reason, the increasing oil price occurred lately became the right momentum to develop the renewable energy.

Indonesia considers the importance of energy diversification through the development of renewable energy as a strategic movement in order to maintain the energy supply security. In this case, Indonesia strives to implement the energy mix strategy through increasing the portion of the new energy usage followed by target and certain time period.



III. INTER PARLIAMENTARY COOPERATION MATTERS

1. Legislation

2. Parliamentary Capacity Building

3. Natural Disaster Management

Natural disaster is one of the pressing issues in our region. It inflicts enormous losses in human lives and catastrophic repercussion on economy. No countries is immune to natural disasters, and no single country can cope with disasters by itself. In addition of preparedness, disasters and emergency responses are trans –boundary in nature. This high level of interdependence should therefore be addressed accordingly through collective measures. Every major disasters requires the immediate emergency responses.

The high potency of natural disasters is basically not more than the natural phenomenon that geographically specific for our country. Indonesia is an archipelago where the three largest plates of world meet, there are Indo- Australia plate, Eurasia plate, and Pasific plate. The interaction between these plates will further place Indonesia as the region which has a high activity of volcanoes and earthquakes.

At this point, Indonesia is considered as a potential disaster region. So the understanding and sustainable early disaster management should be developed, in order to enable us loving side by side in harmony with it.

One of the strategies to reduce the loss due to disaster occurrence possibility is by implementing a routine and sustainable mitigation. Mitigation will be more precise and accurate through the risk evaluation approach. Proactive approach to reduce the risk of disasters becomes one of the most important issues of mitigation activities, thatin the end every society is able to adapt with the potential risk of disasters.

There’s the urgency for Indonesia to expedite the birth process of The Disaster Management Act. We monitor that there are many parties that have given input and even assist us in developing the draft of the Bill to the House of Representatives.

Also, the disaster management guidance have been scattered in various international instruments such as Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian / Disaster Relief sponsored by the Red Cross Federation and Red Crescent International and several international NGOs concerning in humanitarian aids.

Beside this, simultaneously, legislatives and executives can ratify the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. Therefore, many victims of conflicts and aftermaths in Indonesia often exile and deserted in another country.

Another urgent matter is taking care of the IDPs ( Internally Displaced Persons ) that is outside of the jurisdiction of the 1951 Refugees Convention that only mentions about the inter- country refuge. This IDP issue should be integrated with the Disaster Management Act or a new Act should be developed. The reference will lead to The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement produced by Office for Coordinating of humanitarian Agencies ( OCHA ) of the United Nations in 1998.

4. Poverty Reduction

Indonesia national development process refers to the Millenium Declaration 2000 aims to increase the level of human quality of life in year 2015, especially through global poverty reduction program. The ultimate challenge faced in order to alleviate poverty is the challenge in achieving the reduction target in half of the world poverty society. According to MDGs Report in 2006, total population earn less than USD 1 is 19% from the world population. Comparing to previous years, the number of the poverty societies have been decreased, but total population with extreme poverty has been increased up to 140 millions.


In national level, the government should empower and develop SME (Small Medium Enterprises ) in order to alleviate poverty especially through micro credit financing. In this case, Indonesia should put effort on increasing her role and participation of the developing countries effectively in the decision making in international finance especially in the FID frame. International aid channelled to developing countries for carrying development, is manifested in the form of ODA, elimination or reduction of foreign debt, and increasing capacity. It’s also given through the increasing access towards international money market.

Indonesia should also encourage the donor countries, financial institutions and also the UN so that debt swap for MDGs and debt to equity swap can be accepted widely.


5. Gender Issues in Parliament

As stated by Kofi Annan, former secretary general of the United Nations, the role of women in decision making was central to the advancement of women around the world. As women are effected as any man by the challenges facing humanity in the 21st century, it is therefore, right and indeed, necessary that women should be engaged in decision

Therefore, Indonesia should promote processes to further confine women to play more active role in all aspects of our life, ultimately in state hood and in governance. Attention should be given on how to address women’s under representation in national government around the world, and particularly in the Asia Pacific. Furthermore, we should also promote woman empowerment through adequate and equal access to good education, capacity building and cooperation. Exchange of best practices among our nation is one sure way to achieve it.

Efforts at national levels should be undertake, which includes campaign to increase awareness, policy reforms, improved legislative frameworks and institution development, establishment of national policies an of women strategies for gender equality and regional instruments for the protection of the human right (attached by its paper issued by IPU)

IV. APPF MATTERS

1. APPF Membership
2. APPF Observer Status
3. APPF Rules of Procedures
4. Date and venue of APPF’S18th Annual Meeting
5. Others

Thursday, January 1, 2009

THE REGIONAL AUTONOMY AS AN ACCELERATION in ACHIEVING MDG IN INDONESIAN”

Presented at AT SIXTH ASIAN WOMEN PARLIAMENTARIANS AND MINISTERS’ CONFERENCE
September 23-24, 2008, Ulan bataar, Mongolia

APFFD Mongolia 2008



INDONESIA IN THE REFORM ERA

Earlier prior to the reform, the House of Representatives (DPR RI) was the only legislative institution in Indonesia. However after the third amendment to the 1945 Constitution, there was another institution that came under the name of the House of Regional Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (or DPD).

This is the first time since the inception of DPD RI was established in 2004; the whole 128 representatives were elected directly by the people in the General Election 2004. Every province is therefore represented by four members regardless of the population size of the respective provinces which is totally 32 provinces for the term of membership is 5 years. The existence of DPD RI is expected to be able to bridge the interest for both central and local government as well as to strive for interests and the aspirations of the people in developing and decision making in political agenda as well as in the national development policy. Now, let me explain my views on the topic that I would like to draw entitled “THE REGIONAL AUTONOMY ENTRUSTED TO ACCELERATE IN THE MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS TO BE ACHIEVED BY 2015 THROUGH THE INDONESIAN DEVELOPMENT GOALS IN INDONESIA”

In its Strategic Plan of DPD RI 2004-2009, it has formulated a blue print to make sure that DPD RI as a new institution will achieve its goals, to increase the development of the regions and to strengthen our nation’s democracy, at large with the plan of actions as follows:
1. Regional Autonomy and the Balance of Power between the central and regional governments in the framework of equitable economic development and utilization of natural resources for public prosperity in the regions.
2. Realization of the right of the public in the regions to basic services in education and health
3. Realization of justice, Gender Equality and Social Guarantee for Children’s welfare
4. Protection and promotion of Traditional Rights and Local Culture.
5. Fulfilling and applying Religions Value that can provide answers to problem faced by the nation.
6. Increase the effectiveness of policies to eradicate corruption and reduce Mismanagement of Funds in the state institution.
7. Considerations and Advice to the DPR RI on the drafts State Budget
8. Oversight of the implementation of the State Budget and the State Audit.

It is followed by the already existing the Decentralization as a tool to achieve the above mentioned plan of action.

DECENTRALIZATION

I convey before the Conference of Women Parliamentarian, the DPD RI’s role is clear to actively involve in bridging between the central and regional government in order to accelerate the development for the people welfare concerned through decentralization and regional autonomy policy. The policy of decentralization and regional autonomy has been implemented since 2001, three years prior to the inception of DPD RI itself. Therefore, I would like to reiterate that decentralization is not the end, but merely a mean to achieve the end.

Nevertheless in achieving and accelerating the development of the people’s welfare in the region once should be delegated clearly the authorities within the Nationals and the regions.

DISTRIBUTION OF AUTHORITY NATIONAL AND LOCAL

However central government still intend to give such a guidance and an assistance in order to running the roles of respective local government in assigning their duties. The DPD RI always consult and observe every Heads of Region (Governors) concerned to have a serious and truly care, be responsible and determine to sustain their authorities respectively.

National Authority:

1. Foreign Policy
2. Security and Defend
3. Justice
4. National Monetary & fiscal
5. Religion

Local Authority:
1. Education;
2. Health;
3. Public Works;
4. Housing;
5. Landscaping ;
6. Development Planning;
7. Transportation;
8. Environment;
9. Lands Management;
10. Population and Civil Administration;
11. Woman Empowerment & Children Protection;
12. Family Planning & Family Welfare;
13. social;
14. Man Power and Transmigration affairs;
15. Co-operation and Small and middle enterprises;
16. Investment;
17. Culture and Tourism ;
18. Youth and Sport;
19. National Resilience and internal politics affairs ;
20. Regional autonomy, general Government, local finance administration, local government institution, local civil servant administration, & Sandi affairs;
21. Community and Village Development;
22. statistic;
23. Archive Affairs
24. Library;
25. Communication and information;
26. Agricultures and food resilience ;
27. forestry;
28. Energy and mineral resources;
29. Fishery and marine resources;
30. Trading
31. Industry.




THE IMPORTANT ROLES OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT
WHO ARE LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Fortunately, with the active participation and oversee the implementation of policy by the executive level, DPD RI succeeded in advising them that for the theme of 2008 Annual Government Work Program is in relation to Goal One of MDGs as its target, entitled ‘Acceleration of economic growth to alleviate poverty and unemployment’ which based on 8 development priorities is determined, namely:
1. Improvement of investment, export and employment opportunities
2. Revitalization agriculture, fishery, forestry and rural community development
3. Acceleration of infrastructure development and energy management
4. Improvement of access and the quality of education and health
5. Improvement of poverty eradication effectiveness
6. Corruption eradication and acceleration of the bureaucracy reform proces
7. Strengthening of the defence capabilities and stabilities of internal security
8. Disaster handling and reduction of disaster risks, as well as the improvement of avian flu alleviation.
In 2000, The Millennium …..saw 189 world leaders agree to a set-time bound and measurable goals and targets relating to poverty. These were named the MDGs. Goal one of MDGs is to halve the number of people living in extreme poverty by 2015. That’s only 8 years away; the time to act is now
Therefore, the 2008 state budget law is always based on the above mentioned priorities, and it would be automatically reflected funding into the achievement of MDGs program in 2015.
BEST PRACTICE CASES REGARDING MDGs

The central government budget provides high priority on poverty eradication program, including the fast improvement of the budget of Department of Education, Department of Health and Department of Religious Affairs. With the decentralization, the responsibility on education and health has been delegated to the regional government. This synchronizing politics, programs and allocation of state and regional budget has to be continuously improved to achieve a better and effective development.

From the chart shown on the screen and in achieving the target of MDGs particularly on given agenda MDG 3,4 and 5 have been minimum reached so far. Although in achieving the whole programs of IDGs as well as MDGs will be a tendency to gain a success but DPD RI still faces several problems in making the roles of respective region success in national policy making, which is clearly back up by the relevant regulations. This is because the internal problems are appeared.

Before I conclude my explanation, it is not exaggerate that various innovations implemented by the regions in creating best practices providing prime services and enhancing governments quality. Some regions have implemented e-government into their government public services, thus enhancing efficiency effectiveness and at the same time government transparency. This is the essence of good governance which is the characteristic of a modern government. Good governance must also become the characteristic of regional autonomy of Indonesia.

HYPOTHETICAL FRAME WORK TO ACHIEVE

Furthermore, in implementing policies in enhancing people welfare and infrastructure development, regional government have employed strategies of budget utilisation for correct objective and uses increasing budget allocation for the regions is intended to implement in a consistent purpose to reduce poverty.

As former UN Secretary General Kofi A Annan, message to the Fifth Asian and Pacific Population Conference in Bangkok 2002, quoted as follows:
“The MDGs particularly the eradication of extreme poverty and hunger, cannot be achieved if questions of population and reproductive health are not squarely addressed, and that means stronger efforts to promote woman’s right, and greater investment in education and health, including health and family planning”.


PROBLEM

Apart from the above explanation to pinpoint that recently, income per capita is increasing annually. In 2004, income per capita reached US$ 1.186 but in 2007 it reached US$ 1.946 or an increase of 64 percent within 3 years. This figure is higher than that achieve before the 1998 economy crisis.

Meanwhile, Indonesia gross domestic product (GDP) in 2007 reached IDR 3.957 Trillion. Which such a GDP, Indonesia is included in the list of 20 countries with the highest GDP. Thus, we have been freed from crisis yet there are still many challenges that we have to deal with ahead. Those achievements encourage us to step toward a glorious future, I suppose.

WHAT NEXT?

Once again the task of the DPD RI here is to encourage the relevant qualification authorities and registration bodies to co-operate and work towards a time line and process of deriving mutual acceptance of related qualifications and work experience in order to better facilitate skill exchanges which will improve regional economic prosperity, including acceleration in achieving MDGs.

Thank you for your kind attention and patience to follow this explanation.

To this end, the regional governments are obliged to provide basic services for the people, particularly in education, health and public facilities in accordance with the minimum standard of service. The education budget is annually increased. Furthermore in the budget year 2009, the government is determined to meet the 45% allocation of the state budget for education. The increase of education budget would be realized in the form of more improved and accessible quality and access to education, particularly in the primary and secondary education level.

History shows that great nations are nations which are able to develop their human resources. Human development through education and health is one of the keys elements to achieve those objectives.

Nowadays all regions, whether provinces or regencies/municipalities that have allocated additional fund for School Operational Assistant, so that students are free from all kinds of changes. DPD will act as a bridge to pursue the regional governments to follow the measures of the central government in meeting the constitutional mandate by allocating minimum 20% of their budget for education.

Furthermore, the budget for health and basic infrastructure is continuously improved to provide better quality service and access to the people, particularly in the health sector; the government prioritize basic health service in remote regions by increasing and strengthening Community Health Centre (PUSKESMAS) and integrated Services Units (POSYANDU) as well as providing incentives to doctors and paramedics assigned in those areas.

In another occasion DPD RI can provide input to the regional government while at the same time bridge the gap between the central and the regional governvoments. Thus management of authority and regional finances can truly operate well and be in synergy with the policies of the Central Government pursuant to the regulation in force and in line with the interest of the people whom DPD RI represent, It is by meant that every member of DPD RI represents the people in the regions who directly vested them the mandate to ice their interest.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Accountability and Parliamentary Oversight Seminar – Helsinki, Finland 10 – 13 November 2008















LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT- DPD RI


The World Bank Institute (WBI) in partnership with the Parliament of Finland conducted the Accountability and Parliamentary Oversight Seminar, which took place in Helsinki , Finland from November 10-13, 2008. This event marked 10 years of cooperation between WBI and the Parliament of Finland. The purpose of this year’s event was to bring together Members of Parliament and parliamentary staff in order to discuss the internal and external oversight mechanisms and tools available to legislatures.




Parliament’s oversight function aims to ensure that the government and its agents use their powers and available resources appropriately and with probity, and in ways that respond to the needs and interests of all members of the community. Furthermore, oversight by parliaments and other autonomous accountability institutions can help guarantee that the decisions and actions of the government stay within the bounds of the law, thereby strengthening an open and accountable democracy. Ultimately, oversight enhances public confidence in the integrity of the government’s activities and encourages all groups in the community to accept the policies of the executive branch.


This seminar brought together 25 participants from Liberia , Ghana , Nigeria , Pakistan , Sri Lanka , Thailand , Tanzania and Indonesia (two members of the Public Accounts Committee and one member of parliamentary staff from each country). The Indonesian senate ( DPD-RI ) was represented by Deputy Speaker senator Laode Ida, senator Hamdhani from Central Kalimantan and Mr. Genius Umar, Director, International Affairs Secretariat of DPD-RI. Senator Laode brought a presentation on Legislative Oversight – The Mechanism and Tools and senator Hamdhani presented An Oversight as One of DPD-RI’s Functions and Government Accountability to the Society at Large.

Senator Laode Ida spoke about the big picture of the importance of the Legislative oversight , the characteristic and category of the oversight. He also explained the mechanism of DPD-RI oversight in general. Senator Hamdhani brought more details on how article 22 D (3) of the 1945 Constitution (Indonesian Constitution) mentioned that the DPD should oversee the implementation of laws concerning:
1. Regional Autonomy
2. Formation, Expansion, and Merger of Provinces
3. Relation between Central – Local Government
4. Management of Natural Resources
5. Implementation of State Budget and its Balance Budget between the Central and Local Government
6. Taxation, Education and Religion
The results of the said oversight will be submitted to Parliament (The House of Representatives/DPR) for their consideration.

Both presenters also reported the products of the DPD-RI’s oversight for the 2004 – 2008 period, that includes : 10 Initiatives of Bill, 83 Considerations on various Bills, both proposed by The President or The Lower House, 38 Oversight Results and 23 Decisions related to the State Revenue and Budget (APBN)

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Pictures from THE 8th WORKSHOP OF PARLIAMENTARY SCHOLARS AND PARLIAMENTARIANS, at Wroxton College, Wroxton, Oxfordshire UK, 26 – 27 July 2008









DPD members, Senator La Ode Ida, Mrs. Nyimas Ena, Rev. Ishak Pamumbu Lambe, accompanied with Mrs. Siti Nurbaya, Secretary General of DPD RI, and genius Umar, staff of Secretary General DPD RI for Foreign Relations were invited by the IPU to attend the 8th workshop of Parliamentary Scholars and Parliamentarians, at Wroxton College, Wroxton, UK, on 26 – 27 July 2008.

The purpose of the Workshop was to bring together scholars and parliamentarians in order that research findings likely to be of practical use to parliamentarians can be presented and discussed. The workshop itself built on the success of the previous Workshops, the first held in Berlin in 1994 and the other six at Wroxton College, now the established venue for the event

The village of Wroxton lies three miles outside Banbury and it is within reach of Oxford and can also be reach from London by road and rail.

Wroxton College



Wroxton College is the overseas campus of Fairleigh Dickinson University. It is housed in a magnificent 17th century Jacobean mansion, the ancestral home of Lord North ( Prime Minister under King George III ), and nestling in 50 acres of its own landscaped grounds. The mansion has its own library, chapel, and spacious reading room. There’s even a gymnasium in the building. We have given a guided tour by Lord Norton of Louth, Professor of Governor Director, Center of Legislative Studies, University of Hull, UK, at the weekend of the workshop

Lord Norton of Louth gave tour at Wroxton College

With Senator Nyoman Rudana from Bali




Presentation at Wroxton College


Mrs. Siti Nurbaya, delivered her presentation




During the workshop at Wroxton College



Presented souvenir from DPD-RI to Lord Norton of Louth





SENATOR LAODE IDA VISITED THE HOUSE OF LORDS AND INDONESIAN SOCIETY IN LONDON 2008


SENATOR LAODE IDA VISITED THE HOUSE OF LORDS IN 28 July 2008

The House of Lords is the second house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom and is also commonly referred to as “the Lords”. The Parliament comprises the Sovereign, the House of Commons (which is the lower house of Parliament and referred to as “the Commons”), and the Lords. Membership of the House of Lords was once a right of birth to hereditary peers, but following a series of reforms the House now consists almost entirely of appointed members. Its office is in The Palace of Westminster, London.

DPD – RI members had a meeting with The House of Lords members the day after finishing the workshop at Wroxton College. They were welcomed by Lord Faulkner of Worcester, The Deputy and Speaker of The House.of Lords

Presented souvenir from DPD-RI to Lord Faulkner of Worcester







Group photos with Lord Faulkner


DPD -RI delegates In front of Buckingham Palace.



Senator Laoxde Ida and The Indonesian Ambassador for UK, H.E.Mr. Yuri O. Thamrin.





SENATOR LAODE IDA MET INDONESIAN SOCIETY AT THE INDONESIAN EMBASSY IN LONDON, 29 July 2008

Indonesian delegates of DPD – RI also had a meeting with Indonesian society in London where we explained about the role and function of DPD RI .

With Ian Rowland and Mr. Graham Wynn from The Royal Society for The Protection of Birds ( RSPB ), who received souvenir from DPD RI.





Morning chat at Holiday Villa Hotel, London, with Mrs. Siti Nurbaya, the Secretary General of DPD RI and senator Nyoman Rudana from Bali









Monday, November 3, 2008

EIGHTH WORKSHOP OF PARLIAMENTARY SCHOLARS AND PARLIAMENTARIANS at WROXTON COLLEGE, OXFORDSHIRE, UK 26-27 JULY 2008









DPD RI FOR REGIONAL VOICE -Wroxton college, UK



Indonesian parliament members ( The House of Representatives and The Senate ) participated in the Eighth Workshop of Parliamentary Scholars and Parliamentarians being held on Saturday, 26th July and Sunday, 27th July 2008 at Wroxton College, Wroxton, Oxfordshire, in the United Kingdom. DPD – RI or senate delegates was led by Deputy Speaker DR. Laode Ida.

The purpose of the Workshop was to bring together scholars and parliamentarians in order that research findings likely to be of practical use to parliamentarians could be presented and discussed. The Workshop builds on the success of the previous Workshops, the first held in Berlin in 1994 and the other six at Wroxton College, now the established venue for the event.

Among themes to be covered at this Workshop are (1) legislative ethics and accountability, with papers on the adoption of the accounting officer model in Canada, the domestic effects of legislative ethics reform in the UK, parliamentary scrutiny and oversight of the ‘war on terror’, and government accountability in parliamentary democracies: a case study of Sweden. (2) Parliaments and the Internet, with papers on European Parliaments online, the impact of the Internet on the Chinese National People’s Congress, and the ethics of electronic communication. (3) Developments in the UK Parliament, with papers on Westminster territorial select committees, early day motions, the role of independent MPs, the House of Lords, and a comparison of the Westminster and Scottish parliaments. (4) Gendered ceremony and ritual in parliaments, with papers on India, South Africa and the UK.

Sponsors

The Workshop was sponsored by the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the Research Committee of Legislative Specialists of the International Political Science Association (IPSA), and the Centre for Legislative Studies at the University of Hull. The Workshop was organised by the Centre for Legislative Studies, in conjunction with the Dean of Wroxton College, Dr Nicholas Baldwin.

Programme

The Workshop commenced at 9.15 a.m. on Saturday 26th July and concluded mid afternoon on Sunday 27th July.

There was a concluding panel comprising some of the parliamentarians who attended the Workshop. The panel provided an opportunity for parliamentarians to raise issues and answer questions of concern to them as working legislators. A concluding panel was introduced at the Fourth Workshop and proved stimulating and popular; given its success, it was utilised again at the succeeding Workshops.


Venue

The venue for the Workshop was Wroxton College, Wroxton, Near Banbury, Oxfordshire, in the United Kingdom. Wroxton College was the overseas campus of Fairleigh Dickinson University.

The College was housed in a magnificent 17th Century Jacobean mansion, the ancestral home of Lord North (Prime Minister under King George III), and nestling in 50 acres of its own landscaped grounds. When not attending sessions, participants had an opportunity to explore the mansion and the grounds. The mansion had its own library, chapel, and spacious reading room. There was also a gymnasium in the building. A guided tour of the house would be available during the weekend of the Workshop.

The village of Wroxton was also of interest, with thatched cottages and a parish church housing the remains of various members of the North family, several of them significant figures in the history of England. The village lied three miles outside Banbury. It was within easy reach of Oxford and Shakespeare’s birthplace of Stratford upon Avon. It was also within easy reach of London both by road and rail. The town lied just off the M40 motorway. There was a regular Flightlink coach service between London Heathrow airport and Banbury. There was also a regular Flightlink service between London Gatwick and Banbury. There were taxis available for the short journey from Banbury to Wroxton.

Accommodation

Rooms were available in Wroxton College itself. Each was a very pleasant study bedroom, with en suite facilities. A number have excellent views of the grounds. For the weekend of the Workshop, an inclusive residential rate has been arranged, though participants might also book for specific meals and accommodation. Those wishing to book accommodation and meals in College should use the enclosed registration form.

PROGRAMS :


WELCOME SPEECH
Dr Nicholas D. J. Baldwin, Dean, Wroxton College of Fairleigh Dickinson University
Professor The Lord Norton of Louth, Director, Centre for Legislative Studies, University of Hull


PLENARY SESSION 1
HOLDING GOVERNMENT TO ACCOUNT :
a. UK Parliamentary Scrutiny and Oversight of the ‘War on Terror’ - Mark Shephard, University of Strathclyde.
b. Governmental accountability in parliamentary democracies: The case of Sweden
Ingvar Mattson, Parliament of Sweden

PLENARY SESSION 2
ENHANCING ACCOUNTABILITY
a. Adoption of the Accounting Officer Model in Canada - Donald H. Oliver, Senate of Canada

b. Voices from the shop floor: MPs and the domestic effects of ethics reform
Nicholas Allen, University of Essex

PANEL SESSION 1
PARLIAMENTS AND THE INTERNET

a. European Parliaments Online - Cristina Leston-Bandeira, University of Hull

b. When the Internet turns Digital: What impact does the Internet have upon the Chinese National People’s Congress? - Xiudian Dai, University of Hull

CONSEQUENCES OF DEVOLUTION IN THE UK

a. The Westminster territorial select committees after devolution
Oonagh Gay and Judy Goodall, Library of the House of Commons, UK

b. Divergence or convergence: the Westminster and Scottish parliaments
Barry Winetrobe, Member of the Executive, UK Study of Parliament Group


PANEL SESSION 2
GENDERED CEREMONY AND RITUAL IN PARLIAMENT

a. Contesting the neutrality of the Speaker: Gender, Power and Ceremony in the British House of Commons - Faith Armitage, Birkbeck College, University of London

b. Symbolising the Rainbow: Glimpses of the South African Parliament - Surya Monro, University of Sheffield

c. Disrupting Rituals of Parliamentary Debate in the Indian Parliament - Carole Spary, University of Warwick


LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS IN THE EU AND THE USA

a. The ‘United Parliaments of Europe’ and further considerations on subsidiary democracy
Gerd Grözinger, Universität Flensburg

b. President Clinton’s State of the Union addresses - Jose J. Sanmartin, University of Alicante


PANEL SESSION 3
PARLIAMENTARY BEHAVIOUR IN THE U.K.

a. The Mavericks: The role of Independent MPs in the House of Commons - Mark Stuart and Philip Cowley, University of Nottingham

b. Why do they turn up? - David J. Morgan, Universities of Leicester and Hull


UNDERSTANDING LEGISLATURES [Regency Room]

a. The legislative role of parliaments in democratisation: the case of the Iranian parliament (Majles) - Pedram Saeid, University of Hull

b. The contribution of socio-cultural aspects to the behaviour of parliamentary opposition: some empirical findings - Katrin Steinack, University of Kent


PANEL SESSION 4
MEMBERS ENTERING PARLIAMENT [Lecture Hall]

a. Capacity building for new MPs: Survey of orientation and induction programmes
Ken Coghill, Monash University, Peter Holland, Monash University, Ross Donohue, Monash University, Andy Richardson, Inter-Parliamentary Union, and Cristina Neesham, Monash University

b. Diminishing the Oath of Allegiance: The MP’s right to salary - Hamid Ghany, University of the West Indies


THE ROLE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW [Regency Room]

a. Judicial scrutiny of policy-making: The new face of judicial review. A Case Study of Hong Kong- Anton Cooray, City University of Hong Kong

b. Judicial review of legislative and executive decisions: overlapping or necessity? - Hom Raj Dahal, Association of former members of parliament, Nepal

CONCLUDING PANEL
A question and answer session with parliamentarians

CLOSE OF WORKSHOP

JOINT COMMUNIQUE OF The 16th ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASIA PASIFIC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM ( APPF ), Auckland, New`Zealand, 20 - 24 january 2008

At the invitation the Parliament of New Zealand ,the 16th Annual Meeting of the Asia Pacific Parliamentary Forum (APPF) was held in Auckland, New Zealand from 20 to 24 January 2008 with participants from 21 member parliaments and 9 observer countries.. The Executive Committee convened a meeting on 20 January, before the opening of The Annual Meeting.
On 21 January 2008, at the opening ceremony, Hon. Margaret Wilson, President o the APPF and Speaker of the New Zealand House of Representatives welcomed the participants to the Annual Meeting and declared themeeting open.

His Excellency Mr Sergey Mironov, Former President of the APPF and Chairman of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation and Diputado PatricioWalker, Presiden to the Chamber of Deputies of Chile, addressed the participants.MrYoshinobu Shimamura, Permanent Leader of the Japanese Delegation, delivered a speech to the APPF on behalf of the Honorary President of APPF, His Excellency MrYasuhiro Nakasone.

Delegations were honoured and pleased to have the opportunity to meet the Governor-General of New Zealand, His Excellency Anand Satyanand, and the Prime Minister of New Zealand, the Rt Hon Helen Clark.

In the plenary session on political and security issues delegates discussed a number of topics and made resolutions on the situation in the Korean Peninsula, cluster munitions, the Middle East peace process and the situation in Iraq, and the situation in Myanmar.

In the plenary session on economic and trade issues delegates discussed a number of topics and made resolutions on climate change and sustainable development, energy security, international and regional trade developments, people-centered information, and science and technology.

In the plenary session on regional cooperation in theAsia-Pacific region delegates discussed a range of topics and made resolution on disaster preparedness and pandemic disease,interfaith dialogue and the Alliance of Civilisations, promoting women's participation in politics and the economy, South Pacific fisheries management, and a number of issues of long-term concern to the region,such as demographic changes, water management, human rights,the abduction of citizens, poverty alleviation, the mutual recognition of occupations, free speech, mv /AIDS, child labour, marine pollution, and the treatment and protection of migrant workers.
The 16 the Annual Meeting of the APPF adopted 23 resolutions on these issues, In the final plenary session participants discussed the future role of the APP and agreed that the 17th Annua lMeeting be hosted by the National Assembly of the Lao People's Democrati Republic from 11 to 15 January 2009.

The annual meeting resolved to invite the President of the APPF, after consulting with the Executive Committee and the Honorary Chairperson,to write to the new Executive Committee setting out the idea raised at the 16th Annual Meeting and asking that it:

a. Review the rules of procedure during 2008 and make recommendations for as amendments that it thinks fit to the 17thAnnual Meeting
b. Address the ideas raised at the 16thAnnual Meeting with Laos in terms of developing the draft agenda and schedule for the 17th Annual Meeting

The meeting thanked the Drafting Committee for its efforts in developing a package of resolutions and the joint communique, which contributed to the success of the meeting.

The Annual Meeting expressed its appreciation and gratitude to the New Zealand Parliament for its organisation and hospitality, and especially to Hon. Margaret Wilson, Speaker of the House of Representatives for her Presidency of the APPF, and to the Secretariat and the staff for their hard work, which contributed to the success of the Annual Meeting.

Daily Report of the 16th APPF ( The Asia Pacific Parliamentary Forum ) Meeting in Auckland, New Zealand 20 – 24 January 2008.

19 -20 January 2009

Parliamentary delegates from the Asia Pasific ( ASPAS ) Regions has arrived in Auckland since yesterday. 20 from 27 parliamentarian delegates members of APPF attended were led by The Speakers or Deputy Speakers and parliamentarian members consisted of the Upper and Lower Houses. There were 11 parliaments attended as a visiting delegates from the ASPAS regions.
On 19 Jaunary 2009, there was a Executive Meeting held, discussing drat of agendas of :

1. Political and Security Issues

1.1. Situation in the Korean Peninsula
1.2. Institutional building in the Asia Pacific, include report/briefing on ASEAN, APEC, EAS
1.3. Cluster Munitions
1.4. Good Governance
1.5. Middle East Peace Process

2. Economic and Trade Issues

2.1. Climate change and sustainable development
2.2. Energy security
2.3. International and regional trade development (The South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organization)
2.4. Science and Technology

3. Regional Coorperation in the Asia- Pacific Region

3.1. Disaster preparedness and pandemic disease
3.2. Interfaith dialog and alliance of civilization
3.3. Promoting women’s participation in politics and the economiy
3.4. Issues of long-term concern to the region (demographic change, water management, human right, poverty alleviation, treatment and protection of migrant workers)

4. Future Work of the APPF

4.1. Date and venue of the 17th Annual Meeting
4.2. Measure to increase the role of the APPF as the inter-parliamentary organization and promote cooperation with other countries.

5. Adoption of resolution and Joint Communique

The main topics discussed in terms of resolution draft were divided into 3 groups :
1. Politics and Security
2. Economy and Trade
3. Partnerships in the ASPAS region.

Up to 20 January 2008, 50 resolution drafts have been submitted including 6 drafts from DELRI ( Delegation of Repibli of Indonesia ), entitled :
1. Climate Change And Sustainable Development
2. Middle East Peace Process
3. Disaster Preparedness And Pandemic Disease Prevention
4. Energy Security
5. The Protection Of Migrant Workers
6. Poverty Alleviation

All the 50 drafts would be discussed and merged into 13 resolutions with topics :

I. Politics and Security

1. Situation in the Korean Peninsula
2. Institutional building in the Asia Pacific, include report/briefing on ASEAN, APEC, EAS
3. Cluster Munitions
4. Good Governance
5. Middle East Peace Process

II. Economy and Trade :

6. Climate change and sustainable development
7. Energy security
8. International and regional trade development (The South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organization)
9. Science and Technology

III. Partnerships in the ASPAS region.

10. Disaster preparedness and pandemic disease
11. Interfaith dialog and alliance of civilization
12. Promoting women’s participation in politics and the economiy
13. Issues of long-term concern to the region (Demographic Change, Water Management, Human Right, Poverty Alleviation, Treatment And Protection Of Migrant Workers)

At the end of the meeting, all resolutions will be summarized into a Joint Communique signed by the Chief delegates as an authentic script at the end of the meeting.
Also reported that before entering Committee Executive Meeting and as the early preparation to participate at the APPF meetings, on 19 January 2008 a consultation meeting of DELRI ( DPR RI ( Upper House ) and DPD RI ( Lower House ) ) and The Indonesian Embassy of New Zealand has been held to synchronize the agenda meeting with the DELRI position.
Executive Committee meeting that afternoon was led by The Chief of Executive Committee from New Zealand and 9 members representing North East Sub Region, South East Asia, Oceania and America, including DELRI as the member of Executive Committee.

On 20 January 2008 DELRI has been doing some activities in Auckland as followed :
1. Visited Memorial Museum of Auckland to have first hand knowledge of New Zealand.
2. Attended Welcome Reception from The Governor of Auckland and The Speaker of New Zealand Parliament Hon. Margaret Wilson.
3. Dinner Reception with the Indonesian Ambassador for New Zealand HE. Amris Hassan.

Daily report of the 16th APPF ( The Asia Pacific Parliamentary Forum ) Meeting in Auckland, New Zealand.

AN OVERVIEW OF THE HOUSE OF REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA ( DPD-RI )

An Overview of DPD-RI



WHAT IS THE DPD-RI

The House of Regional Representatives of The Republic of Indonesia or Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia ( DPD – RI ) is a legislative chamber that was established in 2004 and focuses on regional affairs. It is sometimes called as Regional Representatives Council . Each province has four representatives who are elected in a general election every five years as independent candidates. The DPD RI is located in the National Parliamentary Compound in Senayan area in South Jakarta .



THE DPD RI LEADERSHIP



Left to right : senator Laode Ida, senator Ginandjar Kartasasmita, senator Irman Gusman, at the DPD-RI Plenary Meeting 22 August 2008




The leadership of the DPD-RI consists of Chairperson and a maximum of two Vice Chairpersons. Under the DPD-RI’s Standing Orders, the composition of the DPD-RI Leadership must reflect representation for the regions of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This entails representation for three broad regions :
The Western Region, comprising the islands of Sumatra, the Riau Islands and the Banka – Belitung Islands.
The Central Region, comprising the islands of Java, Bali and Kalimantan ( Borneo ).
The Eastern Region, comprising the island of Sulawesi, the Maluku Islands ( Moluccas ), Papua and Nusa Tenggara.

The duties of the DPD-RI leadership include serving as spokepersons for the DPD-RI, implementing and publicizing decisions of the DPD-RI, and holding consultations with the President of the Republic of Indonesia and with other institutions.

The DPD RI leadership for 2004 – 2009, effected on 1 October 2004

Prof.Dr.Ir.H.Ginandjar Kartasasmita
Chairperson of the DPD-RI.

A senior figure on Indonesia’s political stage, he has held numerous important government positions. He served as Minister of Mining and Energy ( 1988 – 1993 ), and as Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Finance and Industry, a position which he held concurrently with that of Chairman of the National Development Planning Agency ( Bappenas ) from March – May 1998. From 1999 to 2004, he served as Vice Chairperson of the People’s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia from the Golkar fraction. In the direct selection for the DPD-RI, he took first place in the Province of West Java.

La Ode Ida, Phd
Vice Chairperson of the DPD-RI.

With a strong tract record as an NGO activist, he has extensive experience in working with stakeholders at the grassroots, which is a significant element to strengthen the role of DPD-RI. He has also regularly analyzed political developments in articles written for various media. He served as consultant in the World Bank’s National Management Team ( 2001 – 2002 ) and most recently as a member of the Constitutional Committee established by the MPR-RI to comprehensively examine the amendments to the 1945 Constitution. He took first place in the 2004 elections in the Province of Southeast Sulawesi.

H. Irman Gusman, SE, MBA.
Vice Chairperson of the DPD-RI.


A prominent representatives of the business community within the DPD-RI, he’s one of the several young entrepreneurs holding seats in the DPD-RI. A graduate of a US university, he has vast experience in the private sector. His main political experience has been as Deputy Chairperson of the Regional Delegates Faction ( Fraksi Utusan Daerah / F-UD ) in the People’s Consultative Assembly ( MPR-RI ) from 1999 to 2004. In the direct election for the dPD-RI, he took first place in West Sumatra.



WHY WAS THE DPD RI CREATED

The DPD-RI was created to give a voice to the regions in national politics.
It conveys the aspirations of the provinces to the House of Representatives or Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat ( DPR –RI) and to the central government by proposing policies and legislation. By acting as a bridge between the regions and national government, the DPD-RI aims to improve the welfare of the people in the regions.

President SBY delivered his speech on regional development at DPD-RI Plenary Meeting, 22 August 2008






The creation of the DPD-RI was one of the fruits of the reform movement that ended the domination of Indonesia’s authoritarian regime, or New Order in 1998. During the 50 years prior to reformation movement in 1998, the central government wielded strong control over the regions, particularly over political life and economic policies.

This led to weak political participation by ordinary people and to economicpolicies that often fell short of meeting the needs and demands of the people of the regions.

Through the 3rd amendment to the 1945 Constitution in 2001, an agreement was reached to create the DPD-RI. This new legislative body aims to ensure that the issues faced by the regionswill receive more attention from the central government than they did in the past.

Since the DPD RI was established through the April 2004 elections,the Indonesian parliament has had two legislative chambers – the DPR-RI and the DPD-RI, which together constitute the MPR-RI ( People’s Consultative Assembly ), in their capacity as membersof the MPR-RI, the DPD-RI members have the powers to amend the Constitution and to dismiss the President and or Vice President during his / her term of office in accordance with the Constitution.

In the DPD-RI, the first house of MPR-RI, provinces with larger populations have larger numbers of seats. By contrast, in the DPD-RI, every province has the same number of seats. This means that in the DPD-RI, all the provinces have equal powers.

The members of DPD-RI are independent figures who are wellknown to the public in their respective provinces. They are elected directly in a general election.



WHAT ARE THE DUTIES OF THE DPD-RI

The DPD-RI is constantly communicating with the public in the regions and local governments and consults with experts to formulate improvements in government policy and to ensure their implementation.

1. Propose Bills to the DPR-RI

Only bills that deals with regional autonomy, relations between the central and regional governments, establishing, partitioning and merging regions, management of natural resources and other economic resources, and fiscal equalization between the central and regional governments.

2. Participate in the discussion of bills together with the DPR-RI

The DPD-RI may take part in discussion of bills related for regional autonomy that have proposedby either government or the DPR-RI, limited to only the bills mentioned under heading ( 1 ) above.

3. Provide advice to the DPR-RI

The DPD-RI provides advice to the DPR-RI on bills relating to the State Budget, taxation, education, and religious affairs; it also provides opinions to the DPR-RI in the selection of members of the BPK ( National Audit Board ).

4. Oversee the implementation of laws


Laws on regional autonomy, establishment, partitioning, and merging of regions; relations between the central and regional governments; management of natural resources and the other economic resources; implementation of the State Budget; taxation, education and religious affairs.

Panel discussion : Leadership of DPD-RI with the Chairman of The Corruption Eradication Commission ( KPK ) Antasari Azhar ( 2nd from left ) and Chairman of the Audit Board DR. Anwar Nasution ( 2nd from right ), 22 August 2008






DIVERSITY OF MEMBERS

The DPD-RI consists of the four members per province, or 128 members who represent the 32 provinces of the Republic of Indonesia. The newly established Province of West Sulawesi is represented by the four members elected in Southeast Sulawesi.

For the first period of 2004 – 2009, political party officials are forbidden to become the members of DPD RI, but for the next period of 2009 – 2013, there are several major changes of the DPD-RI candidates prerequisites, including that the members of political parties are eligible to apply as the candidate of DPD RI.





STRATEGIC VISION AND MISSION

Vision of the DPD-RI

To become a strong, equal and effective legislative institution to struggle for the aspirations of the people and the regions to achieve a dignified, prosperous and just Indonesian society within the framework of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia.

Mission of DPD-RI

To enhance the role and position of the DPD-RIin order to strengthen Indonesia’s system of checks and balances through the amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

To struggle for the aspirations of the people and the regions to achieve euiatable and sustainable public welfare.

To develop mutual cooperation with the main stakeholders in the regions and the center.

To attract greater attention from the central government on important regional issues. To strive for greater legislative powers in order to better represent the regions.

DPD-RI Plenary meeting




STRATEGIC ISSUES 2004 -2009

As representatives of the provinces, the DPD-RI members must have strong links with their constituents. In order to achieve this, they must continuously interact with the regions. This is why the DPD-RI’s legislative calendar requires members to go back to their provinces during recess in order to maintain these strong links.

In the effort to represent the aspirations of the people in the regions, intensive consultations between the DPD-RI members and their constituents during the DPD-RI’s first year of operations produced eight strategic issues that will be the priority of the DPD-RI in its current mandate until 2009. These eight strategic issues are :
1. Health and education.
2. Empowerment of women and guarantees for the welfare of children.
3. Regional autonomy, balance of ower between the center and the regions, reducing economic
inequality between regions and management of natural resources.
4. Active participation in the making of the draft national budget.
5. Oversee the implementation of the national budget.
6. Eradication of corruption.
7. Protection of traditional rights and cultures.
8. Understanding and applying religious values in society.



MAIN TASKS OF THE DPD – RI 2004 – 2009

Ad Hoc Committees ( Panitia Ad Hoc or PAH ) are the core committees of the DPD-RI. Their purpose is to discuss bills tabled by the government, the DPR RI and the DPD-RI itself.

The duties of the Ad Hoc committees are to ensure that the DPD-RI’s coreb Advisory and Oversight functions are carried out effectively. The Ad Hoc committees are responsible tocoordinate relevant research, policy analysis and draft the DPD-RI’s consideration ( formal report with recommendations ) to be submitted to the DPR-RI.

The Ad Hoc Committees have the following areas of jurisdiction :
Ad Hoc Committee I is responsible for regional autonomy, center - regions relationship, establishment, partitioning and merger of regions.

Ad Hoc Committee II is responsible for management of natural resources and other economic resources.

Ad Hoc Committee III is responsible for education, religious affairs, health and empowerment of women.

Ad Hoc Committee IV is responsible for ensuring center – regions financial equality, and deliberation on the selection process of National Audit Board ( BPK ) members.

In addition, the DPD has six supporting committees, as follows :
1. Consultative Committee ( Panitia Musyawarah /PANMUS ) is a body with primary
responsibility is to determine the agenda of DPD-RI.

2. Committee for International Cooperation ( Panitia Kerjasama Antar Lembaga Pemerintah / PKALP is a committee aims at establishing good relationships and cooperation with other representative institutions and acts as the main interlocutor for foreign assistance to the DPD-RI.

3. Bill Drafting Committee ( Panitia Perancang Undang – Undang / PPUU ) is a committee responsible for preparing the bills that are discussed by the DPD-RI or those for submittal to the DPD-RI, and to develop internal house rules ( Standing Orders ) for the DPD-RI.

4. Ethics Council ( Badan Kehormatan / BK ) is a committee ensures appropriate conduct by the members of the DPD-RI. It conducts investigations and verifications of complaints by and / or about DPD-RI members.

5. House of Committee ( Panitia Urusan Rumah Tangga / PURT ) deals with the DPD-RI’s internal housekeeping policies. The duties of the committee are to assist the DPD-RI leadership in planning and preparing budget for effective operations of the DPD-RI.

6. DPD-RI Task Force in the MPR-RI ( Kelompok Anggota DPD di MPR RI ) consists of a group of 32 DPD-RI members whose aim is to maximize the effectiveness of the DPD-RI by lobbying party grouping in the MPR-RI in order to achieve strategic goals.




Amazon Favorites